'Critical Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory of Stereotyping '

' censorious Evaluation of the cognitive Theory of Stereotyping\n\nB231: affectionate Interaction, Exam composing 1998, Question 4.\n\nGraeme Gordon\n\nStereotyping is a form of pre creative thinker that is as paramount in todays inn as it was 2000 years ago. It is a kindly attitude that has stood the probe of time and stock much perplexity by tender psychologists and philosophers alike. Mevery approaches to, or theories of stereotyping have therefore been raised. This move evaluates the cognitive approach that miscellanea is an essential cognitive process that ineluctably leads to stereotyping. Hamilton (1979) call(a)s this a depressing dilemma.\n\nBr declares (1995) comment of stereotyping by parti pris is the holding of derogatory kindly attitudes or cognitive beliefs, the expression of electronegative affect, or the divulge of hostile or discriminatory doings towards particles of a separate on line of their membership to that gathering. This definition imp lies that stereotyping is primarily a assemblageing process, through the individuals psyches within that group. A further subject of stereotyping, defined by Allport (1954) as thinking affliction of otherwises without warrant, is that people make their hear up without any person-to-person experience. This pre thought slightly a unharmed group is wherefore transferred to the stigmatisation of any individuals in that group. It is these ideas that the essay aims to evaluate, through the cognitive process of sorting and the above definitions that bestow about tierce distinct features of stereotyping, that our noesis can be demonstrated through.\n\nThe initiative feature of stereotyping is over-generalisation. A number of studies conducted name that various combinations of traits were associated with groups of different ethnic and internal origin (Katz and Braly, 1933). However, stereotyping does non imply that all members of a group are judged in these ways, just th at a typical member of a group can be categorised in much(prenominal) judgements, that they take in the characteristics of the group. Still, when we talk of a group, we do so by imagining a member of that group.\n\nThe wink feature and characteristic of stereotyping is the exaggeration of the departure between ones own group (the in-group) and the other group (the out-group). This can be traced back to the maneuver of Tajfel during the 1950s - the accentuation principle (Tajfel, 1981). Tajfels crop was specifically on physical stimuli, and think that judgements on such stimuli are not made in isolation, but in the context of other factors. Applied socially - a judgement about an...If you demand to get a full essay, position it on our website:

Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee remarkable quality with 24/7. If you are not good enough at writing and expressing your ideas on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hi re them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'